najgeГеоэкономика энергетикиGeoeconomics of Energetics2687-0703АНО Институт стран СНГ10.48137/26870703_2024_28_4_143najge-155Research ArticleИНСТИТУТЫ И ПРАВОВОЕ РЕГУЛИРОВАНИЕINSTITUTIONS AND LEGAL REGULATIONГИБРИДНОЕ УПРАВЛЕНИЕ ПРОЕКТАМИ ИЗМЕНЕНИЙ ЧЕРЕЗ ПРИЗМУ ТЕОРИИ ВРЕМЕННОЙ ОРГАНИЗАЦИИHYBRID MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE PROJECTS THROUGH THE PRISM OF THE THEORY OF TEMPORARY ORGANIZATIONhttps://orcid.org/0009-0004-7473-539XЧеркасовВ. В.CherkasovV. V.

ЧЕРКАСОВ Виталий Васильевич, доктор экономических наук, заведующий кафедрой управления фирмой Высшей школы корпоративного управления

г. Москва, 119571, пр-т. Вернадского, д. 82, корп. 4

CHERKASOV Vitaly V., Doctor of Economics, Head of the Department of Business Administration Higher School of Corporate Governance

82, b. 4, Vernadsky Avenue, Moscow, 119571

https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6323-9256ЧеркасовН. В.CherkasovN. V.

ЧЕРКАСОВ Никита Витальевич, кандидат экономических наук

г. Москва, 119571, пр-т. Вернадского, д. 82, корп. 4

CHERKASOV Nikita V., PhD (in economics)

82, b. 4, Vernadsky Avenue, Moscow, 119571

РАНХиГСРоссияRANEPARussian Federation20241401202504143–157Copyright © Черкасов В.В., Черкасов Н.В., 20242024Черкасов В.В., Черкасов Н.В.Cherkasov V.V., Cherkasov N.V.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.geoenergy-journal.ru/jour/article/view/155

Гибридное управление проектами изменений (ГУП) представляет собой передовой подход, интегрирующий элементы традиционных и гибких методологий для повышения эффективности проектного управления. Несмотря на значительное концептуальное развитие, критерии и методы применения ГУП остаются недостаточно определенными. Цель данного исследования – дополнить внедрение ГУП в отечественные организационные структуры посредством использования теории временной организации (ТВО). Рассмотрение ГУП через призму ТВО открывает новую парадигму управления проектами изменений, которая особенно актуальна для проектов, требующих баланса между адаптивностью и контролем, и способна приспосабливаться к разнообразным организационным условиям.

Hybrid Change Project Management (HPM) is an advanced approach that integrates elements of traditional and agile methodologies to improve the effectiveness of project management. Despite significant conceptual development, the criteria and methods for the application of HPM remain poorly defined. The purpose of this study is to complement the introduction of HPM into domestic organizational structures through the use of Theory of Temporary Organization (TTO). Viewing the HPM through the TTO prism opens up a new paradigm of change project management, which is particularly relevant for projects that require a balance between adaptability and control, and are able to adapt to a variety of organizational contexts. 

Agileустойчивость компанииорганизационные измененияпроектный подходгибридное управление проектамитеория временной организациитрадиционное управление проектамигибкое управление проектамиAgilecompany sustainabilityorganizational changeproject approachhybrid project managementtheory of temporary organizationtraditional project managementagile project managementReferencesCopola Azenha F., Aparecida Reis D., Leme Fleury A., 2021. The Role and Characteristics of Hybrid Approaches to Project Management in the Development of Technology-Based Products and Services // Project Management Journal. No. 52(1). Pp. 90 –110. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972820956884.Copola Azenha F., Aparecida Reis D., Leme Fleury A., 2021. The Role and Characteristics of Hybrid Approaches to Project Management in the Development of Technology-Based Products and Services // Project Management Journal. No. 52 (1). Pp. 90 –110. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972820956884. (In Eng.)Costantini S., Hall J. G., Rapanotti L., 2021. Using complexity and volatility characteristics to guide hybrid project management // International Journal of Managing Projects in Business. No. 14 (5). Pp. 1135–1162. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-06-2020-0187.Costantini S., Hall J. G., Rapanotti L., 2021. Using complexity and volatility characteristics to guide hybrid project management // International Journal of Managing Projects in Business. No. 14 (5). Pp. 1135 –1162. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-06-2020-0187. (In Eng.)Gemino A., Horner Reich B., Serrador P. M., 2021. Agile, Traditional, and Hybrid Approaches to Project Success: Is Hybrid a Poor Second Choice? // Project Management Journal. No. 52 (2). Рр. 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972820973082.Gemino A., Horner Reich B., Serrador P. M., 2021. Agile, Traditional, and Hybrid Approaches to Project Success: Is Hybrid a Poor Second Choice? // Project Management Journal. No. 52 (2). 161 –175. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972820973082. (In Eng.)International study on the use of Hybrid development approaches in software systems development (2017) // https://helenastudy.wordpress.com/, дата обращения 14.05.2024.International study on the use of Hybrid development approaches in software systems development (2017) // https://helenastudy.wordpress.com/, accessed 14.05.2024. (In Eng.) Joslin R., Müller R., 2015. Relationships between a project management methodology and project success in different project governance contexts // International Journal of Project Management. No. 33 (6). Pp. 1377 –1392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijproman.2015.03.005. (In Eng.)Joslin R., Müller R., 2015. Relationships between a project management methodology and project success in different project governance contexts // International Journal of Project Management, No. 33 (6). Pp. 1377–1392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.03.005.Kuster J., Bachmann C., Hubmann M., Lippmann R., Schneider P., 2023. Project Management Handbook: Agile – Traditional – Hybrid. Springer Berlin Heidelberg // https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-66211-3. (In Eng.)Kuster J., Bachmann C., Hubmann M., Lippmann R., Schneider P., 2023. Project Management Handbook: Agile – Traditional – Hybrid. Springer Berlin Heidelberg // https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-66211-3.Lundin R. A., Söderholm A., 1995. A theory of the temporary organization // Scandinavian Journal of Management. No. 11 (4). Pp. 437 –455. https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-5221(95)00036-U. (In Eng.)Lundin R. A., Söderholm A., 1995. A theory of the temporary organization // Scandinavian Journal of Management. No. 11 (4). Pp. 437 –455. https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-5221(95)00036-U.Reiff J., Schlegel D., 2022. Hybrid project management – a systematic literature review // International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management. No. 10 (2). Pp. 45 –63. https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm100203. (In Eng.)Reiff J., Schlegel D., 2022. Hybrid project management – a systematic literature review // International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management. No. 10 (2). Pp. 45–63. https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm100203.Serrador P., Pinto J. K., 2015. Does Agile work? – A quantitative analysis of agile project success // International Journal of Project Management. No. 33 (5). Pp. 1040 –1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.01.006. (In Eng.)Serrador P., Pinto J. K., 2015. Does Agile work? – A quantitative analysis of agile project success // International Journal of Project Management. No. 33 (5). Pp.1040–1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.01.006.Špundak M., 2014. Mixed Agile/Traditional Project Management Methodology – Reality or Illusion? Procedia // Social and Behavioral Sciences. No. 119. Pp. 939 –948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.105. (In Eng.)Špundak M., 2014. Mixed Agile/Traditional Project Management Methodology – Reality or Illusion? Procedia // Social and Behavioral Sciences. No. 119. Pр. 939–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.105.Status Quo (Scaled) Agile 2020. 4th study on Benefits and Success factors of agile methods // https://www.hs-koblenz.de/en/bpm-labor/status-quo-scaled-agile-2020, accessed 14.05.2024. (In Eng.)Status Quo (Scaled) Agile 2020. 4th study on Benefits and Success factors of agile methods // https://www.hs-koblenz.de/en/bpm-labor/status-quo-scaled-agile-2020, дата обращения 14.05.2024.World Economic Outlook Database. April 2024 Edition // https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2024/April, accessed 14.05.2024. (In Eng.)World Economic Outlook Database. April 2024 Edition // https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2024/April, дата обращения 14.05.2024.World Economic Outlook: Steady but Slow: Resilience amid Divergence // https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2024/04/16/world-economic-outlookapril-2024, accessed 14.05.2024. (In Eng.)World Economic Outlook: Steady but Slow: Resilience amid Divergence // https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2024/04/16/world-economic-outlookapril-2024, дата обращения 14.05.2024.World Economic Outlook: Steady but Slow: Resilience amid Divergence // https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2024/04/16/world-economic-outlookapril-2024, дата обращения 14.05.2024.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.