Preview

Geoeconomics of Energetics

Advanced search

EU GAS MARKET UNDER A SANCTIONS BAN ON RUSSIAN LNG AND REGULATORY RISKS TO SUPPLIES FROM THE UNITED STATES AND QATAR

https://doi.org/10.48137/26870703_2026_34_2_44

Abstract

The article examines the institutional, market, and infrastructure implications for the European Union gas market that arise from the simultaneous impact of two major constraints: the sanctions-driven ban on imports of Russian liquefied natural gas (LNG) starting in 2027 and the extension of EU regulatory requirements, including the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), to external suppliers, primarily from the United States and Qatar. Based on a qualitative institutional analysis and a review of EU regulatory acts, European Commission materials, and ACER reports, it is demonstrated that the impact of these measures goes beyond a simple replacement of Russian volumes and affects supply logistics, the structure of long-term contracts, and the functioning of hub-based pricing, thereby altering market access conditions for external suppliers.
The article explores the institutional consequences of applying CSDDD requirements to companies such as QatarEnergy, Cheniere, ExxonMobil, and other exporters. These consequences include tighter legal obligations, a reconfiguration of risk allocation in long-term contracts, and the emergence of conditions in which supply security depends not on the physical availability of gas in global markets but on the regulatory compatibility of supply chains with EU requirements. The study finds that as the market share of the United States and Qatar expands within the EU, liquidity at major trading hubs declines, while price formation increasingly shifts toward longterm agreements, where pricing more often relies on external benchmarks rather than hub quotations. Taking these transmission channels into account, the article identifies several possible trajectories for the EU gas market in 2027–2030, which differ in how suppliers respond to the Union’s regulatory framework.

About the Authors

S. A. Zaitseva
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Igor V. YUSHKOV, Senior Lecturer of the Department of Political Science 

49 Leningradsky Prospekt, Moscow, 125993 



I. V. Yushkov
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Sofya A. ZAITSEVA, 3rd year Political Science student  

49 Leningradsky Prospekt, Moscow, 125993 



References

1. Council Regulation (EU) 2025/2033 of 23 October 2025 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2025/2033/oj/eng, дата обращения 29.11.2025. (In Eng.)

2. Directive (EU) 2024/1760 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 on corporate sustainability due diligence and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937 and Regulation (EU) 2023/2859 (OJ L, 2024/1760, 5.7.2024) // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/UK/LSU/?uri=CELEX:32024L1760, дата обращения 10.12.2025. (In Eng.)

3. Regulation (EU) 2025/1733 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2025 amending Regulation (EU) 2017/1938 as regards the role of gas storage for securing gas supplies ahead of the winter season // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2025/1733/oj/eng, дата обращения 05.12.2025. (In Eng.)

4. REPowerEU Plan // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:fc930f14-d7ae-11ec-a95f-01aa75ed71a1.0001.02/DOC_1&format=PDF, дата обращения 29.11.2025. (In Eng.)

5. Hall P., 1993. Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State // Comparative Politics. No. 3. Vol. 25. Pp. 275–296. (In Eng.)

6. Sabatier P., 1998. The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Revisions and Relevance for Europe // Journal of European Public Policy. Vol. 5. No. 1. Pp. 98–130. (In Eng.)

7. Sabatier P., Jenkins-Smith H., 1999. The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An assessment // P. Sabatier & H. Jenkins-Smith (Eds.). Theories of the policy process. Westview Press. Pp. 117–168. (In Eng.)

8. Sabatier P., Weible C., 2007. The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Innovations and Clarifications // Theories of the Policy Process., No. 1. Pp. 189–220. (In Eng.)

9. Gas Market Report, Q3 2024 // https://www.iea.org/reports/gas-marketreport-q3-2024, дата обращения 05.12.2025. (In Eng.)

10. Global Gas Security Review 2023 // https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/f45a2340-8479-4585-b26e-ec5e9b14feca/GlobalGasSecurityReview2023IncludingtheGasMarketReportQ32023.pdf, дата обращения 05.12.2025. (In Eng.)

11. Key developments in European electricity and gas markets, 2025 // https://www.acer.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/Publications/2025_ACER_Gas_Electricity_Key_Developments.pdf, дата обращения 05.12.2025. (In Eng.)

12. Key developments in European gas markets – Q3 2024 // https://www.acer.europa.eu/monitoring/MMR/gas_key_developments_Q3_2024, дата обращения 05.12.2025. (In Eng.)


Review

For citations:


Zaitseva S.A., Yushkov I.V. EU GAS MARKET UNDER A SANCTIONS BAN ON RUSSIAN LNG AND REGULATORY RISKS TO SUPPLIES FROM THE UNITED STATES AND QATAR. Geoeconomics of Energetics. 2026;(2):44-59. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.48137/26870703_2026_34_2_44

Views: 27

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2687-0703 (Print)