Prospects for Reducing Common Threats to Economic Security in Post-Soviet Countries Through Harmonized Economic Diplomacy
https://doi.org/10.48137/26870703_2021_16_4_22
Abstract
The article is aimed at substantiating the need to develop and implement a targeted policy of economic diplomacy aimed at reducing and eliminating threats to economic security. The object of the research is the state and assessment of internal, regional and global threats and their impact on the economic growth of the newly independent states. Based on the main goal, we set the task of identifying various goals in foreign economic relations developed by the post-Soviet countries, as well as various approaches and goals in their regional integration. In this regard, the article analyzes global uncertainty and other risks, global trends and events affecting economic security. Particular emphasis is placed on analyzing the prospects for the transition from a unipolar to a multipolar world, in which it is possible to combine national and global interests. In this regard, the impact of local, regional and global threats is considered from the point of view of common obstacles to the economic growth of post-Soviet countries. In an attempt to find ways to overcome these threats, modern methods of economic diplomacy are highlighted, and the creation of a new regional grouping the EAEU is assessed as a new format for combating economic threats, in particular, evaluating the concept of the Greater Eurasian Partnership as an important tool of economic diplomacy. As practical recommendations, specific priorities of economic threats for their elimination and maintenance of economic security with the help of economic diplomacy are presented.
About the Author
Т. N. Manaseryan
Yerevan State University
Armenia
Armenia
Manaseryan Tatul N., D. Sc. (Economics), Professor
1, Alek Manukyan str., Yerevan, 0025
References
1. Glazyev S. Yu., 1997. The basis for ensuring the economic security of the country: an alternative reformation course // Russian Journal. No. 1. Pp. 3–19. (In Russ.)
2. Glazyev S. Yu., 2019. The Great Eurasian Partnership: creating a new world // Eurasian integration: Economics, law, politics. No. 1. Pp. 18–20. (In Russ.)
3. Ahir H., Bloom N., Furceri D., 2018. World Uncertainty Index // Social Science Research Network. October 29 // https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3275033, accessed 05.10.2021. (In Eng.)
4. Bremmer I., Kupchan C., 2021. Top Risks 2021. Eurasia Group. Pp. 27 // https://www.eurasiagroup.net/issues/top-risks-2021, accessed 05.10.2021. (In Eng.)
5. Glaser C., 1997. The Security Dilemma Revisited // World Politics. Vol. 50. No. 1. Pp. 171–201. (In Eng.)
6. Burns J. F., Somaiya R., 2012. Murdoch Resigns From His British Papers’ Boards // https://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/22/world/europe/murdoch-resigns-from-britishnewspaper-boards.html, accessed 05.10.2021. (In Eng.)
7. Kremer-Matyškevič I., Černius G., 2019. Country’s Economic Security Concept: Theoretical Insights // https://repository.mruni.eu/bitstream/handle/007/16031/WOE_Kremer-Maty%C5%A1kevi%C4%8D.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y, accessed 05.10.2021. (In Eng.)
8. Leuchtenburg W. E., 1963. Franklin D. Roosevelt and the New Deal, 1932–1940 / New York: Harper and Row. 393 p. (In Eng.)
9. Morris L., Deprez L., 2013. The Faltering Safety Net in A Reluctant Nation: Women’s Economic Security at Risk in America // Women’s Studies International Forum. Vol. 47. DOI:10.1016/j.wsif.2013.11.002. (In Eng.)
10. Muller C., 2015. California State University Catastrophic (Cat) Leave Donation Program: Demographics, Economic Security, And Social Equity // Journal of Health and Human Services Administration. Vol. 38. No. 1. Pp. 108–159. (In Eng.)
11. Quinn J., Cahill K., 2016. The New World of Retirement Income Security in America. // American Psychologist. Vol. 71. No. 4. P. 321–333. (In Eng.)
12. Šimašius R., Vilpišauskas R., 2005. The Concept of Economic Security and the Principles of Economic Security Policy in Lithuania // Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review. Pp. 249–266. (In Eng.)
13. Tamošiūnienė R., Munteanu C., 2015. Current Research Approaches to Economic Security. New Challenges in Business Research // 1st International Conference on Business Management. Valencia (Spain) Pp. 55–58. DOI:10.4995/ICBM.2015.1537 // https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314707212_Current_research_approaches_to_economic_security, accessed 05.10.2021. (In Eng.)
14. Economic Policy Uncertainty Index. Methodology // https://www.policyuncertainty. com/methodology.html/, accessed 05.10.2021.
15. Impact of COVID-19 on Lives, Livelihoods and MSMEs. Assessment Report, 2020. Pp. 15–36 // https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/Impact_of_COVID_19_on_lives_Report.pdf, accessed 05.10.2021. (In Eng.)
16. Sergey Glazyev: «Meaningful long-term initiatives are needed within the framework of the Great Eurasian Partnership» // http://www.eurasiancommission.org/ru/nae/news/Pages/28-09-2020-2.aspx, accessed 05.10.2021. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Manaseryan Т.N. Prospects for Reducing Common Threats to Economic Security in Post-Soviet Countries Through Harmonized Economic Diplomacy. Geoeconomics of Energetics. 2021;(4):22-43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.48137/26870703_2021_16_4_22
Views:
72
Email this article 