WORKERS’ COOPERATIVES AS A DRIVER OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY

The article analyzes the adequacy of the cooperative form of socio-economic organization for the development of information technologies. Workers’ technological cooperatives were chosen as the subject of this study. The results of surveys of Stackoverflow.com site developers from 2015 to 2022 were used as the factual basis of the article. The sample size of respondents was 70 thousand developers, which made it possible to ensure the reliability of the author’s provisions and conclusions.
The methodological basis of the work was the modern neoinstitutional theory, which gives two directions for research logic. Firstly, the authors were guided by the conceptual representation of classical institutionalism (not denied by the neoclassics) about the systemic quality of institutions, which, when applied to a cooperative organization, makes it possible to determine its exclusive properties relevant for integration into the information mainstream. And, secondly, the theoretical provisions of neo-institutionalism about the active role of individuals in the formation and development of institutions (in our case, cooperatives) were taken into account. Cooperators, seeking optimal forms and types of functioning of their enterprises, thereby create their adaptive potential to innovations in the field of information technology.
To analyze the data of sociology, the authors used both general scientific and special research methods: static analysis and graphical visualization.
The purpose of the article was to determine the compliance of cooperative associations with current trends in the promotion of information technology. IT cooperatives operate in a variety of types and industries: from web development to graphic design, web hosting, design and final production of complex technological products.
Thus, the object of consideration of the authors of the article was the sphere of information and communication technologies, and the subject – cooperative processes in the IT sector.

1. Altman M., 2006. Workers cooperatives as an alternative competitive organizational form // Advances in the Economic Analysis of Participatory and Labor-Managed Firms, Vol. 9. Рp. 213–235. DOI:10.1016/S0885-3339(05)09007-1. (In Eng.)

2. Arruda M., 2004. What is a solidarity economy? // Fórum Social Mundial. Рp. 23–28. (In Eng.)

3. Belloc F., 2019. Why Isn’t Uber Worker-Managed? A Model of Digital Platform Cooperatives // CESifo Working Paper. No. 7708 // http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3418632. (In Eng.)

4. Billiet A., Dufays F., Friedel S., Staessens M., 2021. The resilience of the cooperative model: How do cooperatives deal with the COVID–19 crisis? // Strategic Change. Vol. 30. No. 2. Рp. 99–108 // https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2393. (In Eng.)

5. Borzaga C., Salvatori G., Bodini R., 2019. Social and solidarity economy and the future of work //Journal of Entrepreneurship and innovation in emerging economies. Vol. 5. No. 1. Pp. 37–57 // https://doi.org/10.1177/2393957518815300. (In Eng.)

6. Cheney G., Santa Cruz I., Peredo A., Nazareno E., 2014. Worker cooperatives as an organizational alternative: Challenges, achievements and promise in business governance and ownership // Organization. Vol. 21. No. 5. Pp. 591–603 // https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508414539784. (In Eng.)

7. Cooper J., 2022. A Future-Forward Examination of the Viability of Worker Cooperatives Within the Digital Games Industry // https://openresearch.ocadu.ca/id/eprint/3931/1/Cooper_Jay_2022_MA_DIGF.pdf. (In Eng.)

8. Craig B., Pencavel J., 1993. The objectives of worker cooperatives // Journal of Comparative Economics. Vol. 17. No. 2. Pp. 288–308 // https://doi.org/10.1006/jcec.1993.1027. (In Eng.)

9. Esim S., Katajamaki W., 2017. Rediscovering worker cooperatives in a changing world // IUSLabor. Revista d’anàlisi de Dret del Treball. No. 1. (In Eng.)

10. Iyer B., 2020. Cooperatives and the sustainable development goals // Waking the Asian Pacific co-operative potential. Academic Press. Pp. 59–70. (In Eng.)

11. Kawano E., 2020. Solidarity economy: Building an economy for people and planet // The New Systems Reader. Routledge. Pp. 285–302. (In Eng.)

12. Loh P., Shear B., 2015. Solidarity economy and community development: Emerging cases in three Massachusetts cities // Community Development. Vol. 46. No. 3. Pp. 244–260. DOI: 10.1080/15575330.2015.1021362. (In Eng.)

13. Magne N., 2017. Wage inequality in workers’ cooperatives and conventional firms // The European Journal of Comparative Economics. Vol. 14 (2). Pp. 303–329 // http:// dx.doi.org/10.25428/1824-2979/201702-303-329. (In Eng.)

14. McCall D., Kölling M., 2019. A new look at novice programmer errors // ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE). Vol. 19. No. 4. Pp. 1–30 // https:// doi.org/10.1145/3335814. (In Eng.)

15. Morales J., Rusu C., Botella F., Quiñones Otey D., 2019. Programmer eXperience: A Systematic Literature Review // IEEE Access. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2920124. (In Eng.)

16. Nardi J., 2016. Solidarity economy in Europe: An emerging movement with a common vision / European Summer School Prague, Czech Republic. (In Eng.)

17. Navarra C., 2016. Employment stabilization inside firms: An empirical investigation of worker cooperatives // Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics. Vol. 87. No. 4. Pp. 563–585. (In Eng.)

18. Navarra C., Tortia E., 2014. Employer moral hazard, wage rigidity, and worker cooperatives: A theoretical appraisal // Journal of Economic Issues. Vol. 48. No. 3. Pp. 707–726 // https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-362448030. (In Eng.)

19. Oliver N., 1984. An examination of organizational commitment in six workers’ cooperatives in Scotland // Human Relations. Vol. 37. No. 1. Pp. 29–45. DOI: 10.1177/001872678403700102. (In Eng.)

20. Tejaswini, Patil S., Salimath S., Venuprasad N., Nandi R., Mahesh S. P., Bidari I., Satyadhyan C., 2017. Programmer Productivity Analyzer Tool. // 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research (ICCIC). 08 November 2018. DOI: 10.1109/ICCIC.2017.8524506. (In Eng.)

21. Pencavel J., 2013. Worker cooperatives and democratic governance // Handbook of economic organization. Edward Elgar Publishing. Pp. 462–480. (In Eng.)

22. Pencavel J., Craig B., 1994. The empirical performance of orthodox models of the firm: Conventional firms and worker cooperatives // Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 102. No. 4. Pp. 718–744. (In Eng.)

23. Pérotin V., 2013. Worker cooperatives: Good, sustainable jobs in the community // Journal of Entrepreneurial and Organizational Diversity. Vol. 2. No. 2. Pp. 34–47. (In Eng.)

24. Roelants B. et al., 2012. The resilience of the cooperative model // CECOP-CICOPA: Brussels, Belgium. (In Eng.)

25. Roelants B. et al. (ed.), 2019. Cooperatives and the World of Work. (In Eng.)

26. Rubio M. A., 2020. Automated prediction of novice programmer performance using programming trajectories // International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. Springer, Cham. Pp. 268–272. (In Eng.)

27. Van Slyke B., 2013. The Argument for Worker-Owned Tech Collectives // https:// www.fastcompany.com/3021964/the-argument-for-worker-owned-tech-collectives. (In Eng.)

28. Varman R., Chakrabarti M., 2004. Contradictions of democracy in a workers’ cooperative // Organization studies. Vol. 25. No. 2. Pp. 183–208 // https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840604036913. (In Eng.)

29. Wanyama F. O., 2016. Cooperatives and the Sustainable Development Goals A contribution to the post-2015 development debate // https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_emp/documents/publication/wcms_240640.pdf. (In Eng.)

30. Witherell R., 2013. An emerging solidarity: Worker cooperatives, unions, and the new union cooperative model in the United States // International Journal of Labour Research. Vol. 5. No. 2. Pp. 251–266. (In Eng.)